Whenever students come across a task that entails handing in a synopsis of a research paper, they may wonder if the process is simple. If the answer is yes, then everything is a bit complicated. However, handling such instances is easy as long as your instructor allows it. You can never hand in a quality piece if you do not know its worth it. Besides, teachers assign other tasks, including an essay, to evaluate their understanding of the subject and writing skills .
If a teacher wants to test a student’s comprehension ability, then a summarized literature review is the best tool to use. Unfortunately, not every scholar is great at summariting.
You might have written the question in the first place but end up with a complex text. Sometimes the synthesizer section is a difficult part of the write-up. For this reason, even if astudent understands the methodology, he or she will have a hard time critiquing the document. Therefore, before starting the Writing Process, it is essential to seek clarification from the professor.
Do it Properly
When assessing a concluded report, a lecturer will most likely ask the following questions:
What do we mean by the statement?
How did the study relate to the hypothesis?
Did it lead to any of the conclusions?
It is crucial to put the findings of the complete analysis in the conclusion paragraph. Doing so helps the reader and all the experts involved in the project to agree with the writer's interpretation.
In case the synthesis yields a necessary guide to the central thesis, there is a need to summarize it explicitly in the last sentence. I should do that because it is the spot where the author needs to showcase the flaws in the original work. That is why it is ideal for condensing the summary into two sentences. Without it, the scholar will be forced to read the entire manuscript in a hurry and assume the concepts being discussed are useless.
Other Effective Ways
The option is to amplify the points in the paragraphs by combining the ends of the introduction and the rest of the passages. In which cases, however, the intended message is not communicated clearly. What if the scholars had to interpret the instructions and give oral testimonies about the phenomena occurring? The appropriate way to handle a such problem is to combine the details of both the interventions and the interpreted scenario.